WikiLeaks and their supporters: We were for free speech, before we were against it

WikiLeaks and their supporters: We were for free speech, before we were against it

WikiLeaks was painted among many in the media, some libertarians, and the liberal establishment as the poor souls who are fighting against CIA and American intelligensia.

WikiLeaks claims to be all about free speech and the arbiters of it, until someone very powerful gets in their way.

Sarah Palin, who is one of the most powerful voices in America, and willing to stand up to these maniacs, wrote on Facebook about the dangerous and treasonous acts the organization of malcreants have committed against America. John Bolton explained to Judge Andrew Napolitano about the national ramifications WikiLeaks has committed against America and its national security.

Jake Tapper reported exclusively on his blog Political Punch that Sarah Palin and her husband’s credit cards and her organization SarahPAC were hacked by supporters of WikiLeaks.

“No wonder others are keeping silent about Assange’s antics,” Palin emailed. “This is what happens when you exercise the First Amendment and speak against his sick, un-American espionage efforts.”

Palin has criticized Wikileaks founder Assange, writing on Facebook that his “past posting of classified documents revealed the identity of more than 100 Afghan sources to the Taliban. Why was he not pursued with the same urgency we pursue al-Qaeda and Taliban leaders?…Assange is not a ‘journalist’ any more than the ‘editor’ of al-Qaeda’s new English-language magazine Inspire is a ‘journalist.’ He is an anti-American operative with blood on his hands.”

How stupid can these people be? They just proved that they’re not all about free speech. They are all about quelling and silencing opposition with fear. Even if this was out of rebellious means, it’s not cool at all nor funny. It backfires their efforts.