Showing posts with label Tax Cuts. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Tax Cuts. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 15, 2010

Breaking News!! Senate Passes Controversial Tax Cut Deal

Washington (CNN) -- The Senate approved a controversial $858 billion tax cut package Wednesday, overwhelmingly voting to extend the Bush-era tax reductions despite a series of objections from both the left and the right.

The measure, which passed 81-19, now advances to the House of Representatives.

The House will take up the bill Thursday, according to Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Maryland.

The package includes a two-year extension of the Bush-era tax cuts set to expire December 31. It also would extend unemployment benefits for 13 months, cut the payroll tax by 2 percentage points for a year, restore the estate tax at a lower level and continue a series of other tax breaks.

The estate tax -- currently scheduled to exempt inheritances up to $1 million and tax amounts above that at a rate of 55% -- would be reduced under the tax package to a rate of 35% on amounts above a $5 million individual exemption.

New bill has billions in new earmarks
The estate tax impact
Obama makes case for tax plan

The vote came hours after President Barack Obama urged lawmakers Wednesday to approve the deal, which the White House negotiated with Senate GOP leaders.

"I am absolutely convinced that this tax cut plan, while not perfect, will help our economy and create jobs in the private sector," Obama said. "It will help lift up middle-class families who will no longer have to worry about a New Year's Day tax hike."

House Democrats, however, have repeatedly warned that they may change the measure, particularly provisions dealing with the estate tax.

Conservatives argue that a full return of the estate tax would, among other things, make it nearly impossible for many family-owned small businesses to be passed down from one generation to the next. Liberals contend that a lower or nonexistent estate tax would merely benefit the wealthy while doing little to aid the economy.

A number of House Democrats want to change the estate tax to levels previously approved in a separate House bill that would exempt inheritances up to $3.5 million and tax amounts above that at a 45% rate.

However, more than two dozen moderate House Democrats submitted a letter to their House leadership Tuesday, calling for the tax package to be passed unchanged so it can go directly to Obama to be signed into law.

"This bipartisan compromise is by design a temporary measure and, with its passage, we must acknowledge that our work is not done," said the letter signed by 27 House Democrats as of Tuesday evening. "We must continue to work together in a bipartisan fashion -- with a sense of shared responsibility -- toward solutions that address our economic and fiscal challenges. It is time for us to put aside the partisan talking points and accomplish what the American people sent us here to do."

Republicans involved in the negotiations with the White House on the package have warned that any changes by the House could derail the entire proposal, causing tax rates to increase in 2011.

"If the House Democratic leadership decides to make partisan changes, they will ensure that every American taxpayer will see a job-killing tax hike on January 1st," Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Kentucky, said in a statement Monday.

If the House passes a bill that differs from the Senate version, the revised package would need to return to the Senate for another vote. The Senate, in turn, could send back the original bill without any changes to the estate tax provision for a second House vote. Such a scenario, analysts note, would give House liberals unhappy with the president's plan a chance to say they tried to change it.

With the Bush tax cuts set to expire at the end of the year, Obama and Democrats face a fast-approaching deadline to reach a deal. Republicans won control of the House and reduced the Democratic majority in the Senate in the new Congress convening in January, which would give Democrats less leverage to negotiate after the current lame-duck session.

House liberals are not the only ones objecting to the agreement. A number of conservatives, including likely 2012 GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney, are challenging the deal because it doesn't permanently extend the Bush tax cuts and would add to the deficit.

Wednesday, December 8, 2010

Tax Cut Myths and Other Obama-Induced Fantasies

Tax Cut Myths and Other Obama-Induced Fantasies

Tuesday, December 07, 2010 - 02:34 PM

After Obama's compromise with the GOP on the extension of the Bush tax cuts for income above $250,000, which he had long opposed, at least there is finally one thing all sides can agree on: President Obama hasn't got a clue. Even those of us who support tax cuts across the board are flabbergasted. What, exactly, does our president believe? We don't know. He's not a socialist, as many on the right have taken to calling him. He's simply what he's always been: an empty suit. He'll say whatever he has to to get elected. He'll do whatever it takes to be liked. He has carried his record of voting "present" into the White House in a way few presidents have done before. He stands for nothing.

Jennifer Rubin at the Washington Post calls the deal a philosophical victory for Republicans, and that's exactly right. With this deal, the president has admitted that tax cuts do stimulate the economy. After trying all the liberal solutions—which include spending, spending, and more spending—the president is turning to the only thing that works to get our country moving again: letting people keep more of the money they earn.

The arguments against extending the tax cuts have ranged from ridiculous to even more ridiculous. Some popular ones:

• "We shouldn't be giving the rich more money."

Giving? It's their money in the first place! It's like your husband "giving" you a sweater for Christmas that he got out of your closet. It's not giving, it's simply not taking. The top 1% already pay over 40% of the total money collected in taxes. The language of tax increases needs to change and the demonization of the wealthy has to end. President Obama has long led the way of this demonization, calling a tax increase on those who make $250,000 a "millionaire's tax" many times over his campaign.

• "We can't afford to pay for these tax cuts."

Tax cuts are free. They're "cuts." They cost nothing. What people actually mean is that we can't afford to pay for the spending we've budgeted for by using tax increases which haven't happened yet. It's the equivalent of a small widget manufacturer hoping to get a deal to sell his product to Walmart and basing his yearly budget on the possibility that Walmart will buy from him. When Walmart decides to go with a different widget producer, is it Walmart's fault the manufacturer's business collapses? It's not. We shouldn't be spending money we don't have, and we certainly shouldn't be spending more money we don't have with the hopes that "the rich" will pay more than their share to make up for our reckless spending.

• "This is a great deal for Republicans."

This one is half-right. Again, it's a philosophical victory, and sure, all tax cuts are good tax cuts. And yes, in a political sense, anything that makes Barack Obama look bad, especially in such a capitulating fashion, is good for the Republican party. But ultimately, tax cuts are only one part of the good economy equation. We now have 161 weeks of unemployment benefits thanks to this "deal." This is a major drain on employers and will stifle growth.

Our spending habits need to change. The government can't keep saving failing businesses and propping up dying industries. There aren't enough "rich" people to pay for that kind of lunacy. It would be nice if the president understood this. It would be even nicer if he believed in something and had consistency in his beliefs.